Simulation time Day 0
Click a well to collect a sample.
Ready to investigate
Domain 600 m × 300 m
Shallow thickness 12 m
Deep thickness 18 m
Mean pore velocity 0.43 m/day
Contaminant mass in aquifers 0 g
Evidence over time

Well concentration graph

Construct an explanation

Source-location claim

Model guide

How the revised model works

Groundwater flow

The model calculates pore velocity from hydraulic conductivity, hydraulic gradient, and effective porosity. Pumping changes hydraulic head and bends the flow field toward the municipal well.

Recharge

Recharge changes hydraulic head, contaminant leaching, and dilution. A storm pulse can mobilize more contaminant while also increasing the amount of groundwater available for dilution.

Confining layers

The shallow and deep aquifers exchange water and contaminant mass according to aquitard thickness, continuity, fractures, vertical conductivity, and the head difference between layers.

Transport

Advection carries dissolved contaminant with groundwater. Longitudinal and transverse dispersion spread the plume. Nitrate-like and petroleum-like presets add simplified decay, retardation, and persistence.

Contaminant mass

The “Contaminant mass in aquifers” readout adds together the contaminant currently stored in both the shallow and deep aquifers. It does not represent the concentration at a single well or the amount still waiting at the source. The value can increase while the source releases contaminant and decrease as contaminant leaves the model boundary or undergoes simplified decay.

Learning alerts

Teaching modes explain important cause-and-effect events. Mystery Mode only reports evidence from wells students have sampled, so it does not reveal the source-location answer.

Well evidence

Each well reports hydraulic head and concentration across its screened layer. In visible-source modes, live readings update as the model runs. Clicking a well saves a time-stamped measurement that remains fixed in the sample history. Nested shallow and deep wells help reveal vertical differences.

Two views

Map view shows plume direction, capture zones, geologic patterns, and monitoring-well placement. Cross-section view shows the water table, aquitard, vertical leakage, and well depths.

Important limitation

This is a conceptual two-layer classroom model, not a site-specific regulatory or engineering model. It simplifies three-dimensional geology, chemical reactions, fractures, density effects, and transient groundwater storage.